With my youngest sister-in-law's wedding looming my thoughts have turned to what to wear..............
I don't want to spend alot of money on something that might only get worn once, so I've been thinking about making myself something. And after getting into Mad Men in a s.e.r.i.o.u.s.l.y. BIG way I thought vintage might be the way to go! It's going to be a day time wedding so no need to go overboard with the dress.
Something classy and classic I think.
Luckily I have a few vintage patterns in my stash!
Not because I ever really thought I would use them but just because I love to look at them.
These are the ones I'm considering.
This pattern, Simplicity 4116, is actually not vintage, but was a free download from somewhere. I think with the right fabric, it does have a vintage feel.
This dress is gorgeous. Vogue 5565, the pattern includes a cute little 3/4 length sleeve jacket.
Simplicity 5017. Simple yet stunning 1960's evening dress..............
Vogue 5782. Screams Joan. Love, love, love this dress.
So which one do I go with? Which is your favourite?
I love, love, love the black one.
ReplyDeleteI like Vogue 5565 and think it would be chic and slimming. I also love the full skirt on 5017, but think the neckline would be a little conservative. Either way make a toile first - I find those vintage patterns can be a little tricky.
ReplyDeleteI love the Simplicity 5017, it is really beautiful and would be perfect for a wedding. What colour would you do it in? Solid or printed? I can't wait to see what you come up with!
ReplyDeleteHej Fran
ReplyDeleteI agree with you... LOVE the Vogue 5782, but you should wear the gloves too!
Whatever you decide to make, it's going to be fantastic!
Happy Sewing!
LOVE PEACE enJOY
Julie
x
I love these, my vote(s) are for the last two, can't wait to see what you choose + fabric! - kb
ReplyDeleteSimplicity 5017 for me
ReplyDelete5565 or 5017. But they're all fabulous. Can't wait to see what you decide to do and how they turn out.
ReplyDeleteA
Am I too late to comment? I like the last one!
ReplyDelete